A Study of the Effectiveness of Edmodo on Preservice Classroom Teachers’ Views of Web-Assisted Collaborative Learning Environments, Sense of Classroom Community, and Perceived Learning

  • Nazire Burcin Hamutoglu Department of Computer and Instructional Technology Education, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey
  • Orhan Gemikonakli Department of Design Engineering and Mathematics, Middlesex University, London, United Kingdom
  • Deniz Mertkan Gezgin Department of Computer and Instructional Technology Education, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey

Abstract

This study explored the effectiveness of using web-assisted collaborative learning (COL) environments on the sense of classroom community and perceived learning (PL) using a learning platform Edmodo to enhance face-to-face learning within the framework of a community of inquiry. This study utilized pre-experimental quantitative research approaches based on a single group, pre-, and post-test model. To establish the effectiveness of the intervention, pre- and post-tests were conducted. To support the findings, independent sample t-test was used to compare the differences within groups such as gender. The findings of this study underline the importance of fostering the interaction of students with each other as well as content and instructors in online COL environments to enhance traditional classroom teaching and learning. The results show the effectiveness of the deployment of web-assisted COL environments on a sense of community of classroom and PL. Keywords: Edmodo, web-assisted technologies, collaborative learning, experimental design.

References

References

Abbey, B. (Ed.). (1999). Instructional and cognitive impacts of web-based education. IGI Global.

Abrahamson, C.E. (1998). Issues in interactive communication in distance education. College Student Journal, 32(1), 33–43.

Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D.R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42 (2), 233–250.

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2005). Making the grade: Online Education in the United States, 2006. Needham, MA: Sloan-C.

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States. BABSON Survey Research Group, The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/highered.html

Anderson, A. A. (1996). Predictors of computer anxiety and performance in information systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 12 (1), 61–77.

Bates, A. W. (2005). Technology, E-learning and Distance Education. London, UK: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203463772.

Bell, L. (2001). Preparing tomorrow’s teachers to use technology: Perspectives of the leaders of twelve national education associations. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 1(4) 517–534. Retrieved 5 September 2016 from http://www.editlib.org/index.cfm/files/paper_10740.pdf?fuseaction=Reader.DownloadFullText&paper_id=10740.

Brooks, J.G., & Brooks, M.G. (1993). The case for constructivist classrooms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA.

Brown, K.M. (1996). The role of internal and external factors in the discontinuation of off-campus students. Distance Education, 17(1), 44–71.

Bullen, M. (1998). Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 1-32.

Chen, M. (1986). Gender and Computers: The Beneficial Effects of experience on Attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing, 2.

Cho, H., Lee, J. S., Stefanone, M., & Gay, G. (2005). Development of Computer Supported Collaborative Social Networks in a Distributed Learning Community. Behaviour & Information Technology 24(6), 435–447. doi:10.1080/01449290500044049.

Cook, D. A. (2005). Learning and cognitive styles in web-based learning: theory, evidence, and application. Academic medicine, 80(3), 266-278.

Deghaidy, H. E., & Nouby, A. (2008). Effectiveness of a blended e-learning cooperative approach in an Egyptian teacher education programme. Computers & Education, 51(3), 988–1006.

Dewiyanti, S., Brand-Gruwel, S., Jochems, W., & Broers, N. J. (2007). Students’ experience with collaborative learning in asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 496–514.

Dietz-Uhler, B., Fisher, A., & Han, A. (2008). Designing online courses to promote student retention. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 36(1), 105-112. doi:10.2190/et.36.1.g.

Durndell, A., & Hagg, Z. (2002). Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 521–535.

Durndell, A., & Thomson, K. (1997). Gender and computing: A decade of change. Computers and Education, 28(1), 1–9.

Edmodo Web Page (2016). Retrieved from https://www.edmodo.com/?language=tr.

Engelbrecht, E. (2005). Adapting to changing expectations: Post-graduate students’ experience of an e-learning tax program. Computers & Education, 45, 217–229.

Fetler, M. (1985). Sex Differences on California State-Wide Assessment of Computer Literacy. Sex Roles,13, 181-186.

Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Facilitating Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: Interaction Is Not Enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson., T., & W. Archer (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education2, 2(3), 87–105.

Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. ommunication Education, 37, 40-53.

Guuawardena, N. C., Nola, A. C., Wilson, P. L., Lopez-Islas, J. R., Ramirez-Angel, N., & Megchun-Alpizar, R. M. (2001). A crosscultural study of group process and development in online conferences. Distance Education, 22, 85–121.

Harrington, R., & Loffredo, D.A. (2010). MBTI personality type and other factors that relate to preference for online versus face-to-face instruction. The Internet and Higher Education, 13 (1), 89–95.

Hubbard, P., & Levy, M. (2016). Theory in computer-assisted language learning research and practice. The Routledge Handbook of Language Learning and Technology, 24.

Huang, M.H. (2002). Toward constructivism for adult learners in online learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), 27-37.

Hwang, W. Y., Wang, C. Y., Hwang, G. J., Huang, Y. M., & Huang, S. (2008). A web-based programming learning environment to support cognitive development. Interacting with Computers, 20(6), 524-534.

Igbaria, M., & Parasuraman, S. (1989). A path analytic study of individual characteristics, computer anxiety and attitudes toward microcomputers. Journal of Management, 15, 373–388.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1996). Cooperation and the use of technology. (Ed: D. H. Jonassen). Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, 1017-1044. New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan.

Joliffe, A., Ritter, J., & Stevens, D. (2001). The online learning handbook: Developing and using web-based learning. Kogan Page: Springer.

Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning. Wee co op: Resources for Teacher, Inc.

Kao, P. C. & Tsai, C. C. (2009). Teachers’ attitudes toward web-based professional development, with relation to Internet self-efficacy and beliefs about web-based learning. Computers & Education, 53(1), 66-73.

Kearney, P., Plax, T.G., & Wendt-Wasco, N.J. (1985). Teacher immediacy for affective learning in divergent college classes. Communication Quarterly, 33(1), 61-74.

Khosa, D. K. (2014). Processes of metacognitive regulation and knowledge co-construction in case-based collaborative learning at university (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Murdoch University, Australia.

Lee, L., Lajoie, S.P., Poitras, E.G. et al. (2016). Co-regulation and knowledge construction in an online synchronous problem based learning setting. Educational Information Technology, 1-28 doi:10.1007/s10639-016-9509-6.

Liaw, S. S. (2002). An Internet survey for perceptions of computers and the World Wide Web: relationship, prediction, and difference. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(1), 17-35.

Liaw, S. S. (2005). Developing a Web assisted knowledge construction system based on the approach of constructivist knowledge analysis of tasks. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(1), 29–44.

Liaw, S. S., Chen, G. D., & Huang, H. M. (2008). Users’ attitudes toward Web-based collaborative learning systems for knowledge management. Computers & Education, 50(3) (2008), 950–961.

Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2003). An investigation of users attitudes toward search engines as an information retrieval tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(6), 751–765.

Liaw, S.S., Chang, W.C., Hung, W.H., & Huang, H.M. (2006). Attitudes toward search engines as a learning assisted tool: Approach of Liaw and Huang’s research model. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 177–190.

McCroskey, J.C., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J.M., Richmond, V.P., & Barraclough, R.A. (1996). Nonverbal immediacy and cognitive learning: A cross-cultural investigation. Communication Education, 45, 200-211.

McDonald, A. S. (2002). The impact of individual differences on the equivalence of computer-based and paper-and-pencil educational assessments. Computers & Education, 39(3), 299–312

Meier, S.T., & Lambert, M.E. (1991). Psychometric Properties and Correlates of Three Computer Aversion Scales. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 23(1), 9-15.

Moore, M.G. (1993). Three types of interaction. (Ed: K. Harry, M. Hohn, and D. Keegan). Distance education: New perspectives, 12-24, London: Routledge.

Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.

Palloff, M. R., & Pratt, K. (2001). Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace. American Secondary Education, 29(1).

Petersen, S.A., Chabert, G., & Divitini, M. (2006). Language learning: Design considerations for mobile community blogs. IADIS International Conference Mobile Learning, 14–15, Dublin. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.159.6177&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

Petraglia, J. (1998). The real world on a short leash: the (mis)application of constructivism to the design of educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development,46 (3), 53–65.

Rafaeli, S., Barak, M., Dan-Gur, Y., & Toch, E. (2004). QSIA – a Web-based environment foe learning, assessing and knowledge sharing in communities. Computers & Education, 43, 273–289.

Rovai, A. (2002). Building a sense of community at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1), 1-16. Accessed from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/79/152

Rovai, A. P. (2002a). Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. Internet and higher Education, 5, 197-211.

Rovai, A. P. (2002b). Building sense of community at a distance. International review of research in open and distance learning, 3(1), retrieved august, 2 from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02504946.

Rovai, A.P., & Lucking, R. A. (2000). Measuring sense of classroom community. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Rovai, P. A., Wighting, J. M., Baker, J. D. and Grooms, L. D. (2009). Development of an instrument to measure perceived cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning in traditional and virtual classroom higher education settings. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 7-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.002

Shea, P., Li, C.S., & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 175–190.

Steinkuehler, C. A., & Williams, D. (2006). Where everybody knows your (screen) name: Online games as "third places". Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 885- 909. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00300.x

Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. JALN, 7 (1).

Szeto, E. (2015). Community of Inquiry as an instructional approach: What effects of teaching, social and cognitive presences are there in blended synchronous learning and teaching? Computers & Education, 81, 191–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.015.

Temple, L., & Lips, H. (1989). Gender Differences and Similarities in Attitudes Towards Computers. Computers in Human Behavior,5, 215-226.

Thirunarayanan, M. O., & Prado, A. P. (2001). Comparing Web-Based and Classroom-Based Learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2), 131-137, doi: 10.1080/15391523.2001.10782340.

Thompson, R.L., Higgins, C.A., and Howell, J.M. (1991). Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15, 125–143.

Triandis, H.C. (1971). Attitude and attitude change. New York: John Wiley.

Tsai, C. C. (2001). The interpretation construction design model for teaching science and its applications to Internet-based instruction in Taiwan. International Journal of Educational Development, 21, 401–415.

Tsai, C. C. (2008). The preferences toward constructivist Internet-based learning environments among university students in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(1), 16-31.

Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 128–143.

Wang, S. K. (2008). The effects of synchronous communication tool (yahoo Messenger) on online learners’ sense of community and their multimedia authoring skills. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(1), 59-74.

Ward, M., & Newlands, D. (1998). Use of the Web in undergraduate teaching. Computers and Education, 31(2), 171-184.

Warschauer, M. (2004). The rhetoric and reality of aid: promoting educational technology in Egypt. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 2(3). Retrieved 28 September 2016 from: http://www.gse.uci.edu/faculty/markw/rhetoric.pdf

Weber, A. (2012). Considerations for social network site (sns) use in education. International Journal of Digital Information and Wireless Communications, 2(4), 37-52.

Wegerif, R. (1998). The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(1), 34–49

Whitely, B. E. J. (1997). Gender differences in computer related attitudes and behavior: A meta analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 13(1), 1–22.

Wu, Y.T., & Tsai, C. C. (2006). University students’ Internet attitudes and Internet self efficacy: A study at three universities in Taiwan. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9, 441–450

Yaghi, H.M., & Abu-Saba, M. (1998). Teacher's computer anxiety: an international perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 14 (2), 331–336.

Yang, F.Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Investigating university student preferences and beliefs about learning in the web-based context. Computers & Education, 50, 1284–1303.

Zhu, E., & Baylen, D.M. (2005). From learning community to community learning: Pedagogy, technology and interactivity. Educational Media International, 42 (3), 251–268.

Published
2019-06-06