An Analysis of the Representation of Practical Work in Secondary Chemistry Textbooks from Different Chinese Communities

  • Xiaoge Chen Department of Biology and Chemistry, Institute for Science Education, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
  • Ingo Eilks Department of Biology and Chemistry, Institute for Science Education, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0453-4491

Abstract

This study analyzes representations of practical work in 10th-grade chemistry textbooks and associated experimental workbooks from different Chinese communities, namely from the People's Republic of China, Taiwan and the Chinese sector in Malaysia. This paper contributes to the current body of knowledge of how practical work in secondary chemistry education is suggested to be applied in Chinese educational contexts. A total of 508 representations related to practical work was identified in seven sets of textbooks. The goal was to gain basic insights into the features associated with suggested approaches to practical work in the textbooks. Our focus was on the suggested type of learning, intended learning outcomes, inquiry level, and aspects of students' engagement with practical work. The results indicate a prevalence of prescribed experiments. This preference is then followed by illustrations of facts and laboratory operation processes. However, only a limited amount of scientific inquiries with at least some amount of openness belongs to the list of preferred items. The intended learning outcomes mainly aim at learning facts. Most textbooks suggest using a structured learning approach. Some suggestions of inquiry-based learning using either guided or open inquiry approaches do occur, but they are relatively limited in the textbooks and do not appear as frequently.

References

Abdâ€Elâ€Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A. P. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 835-855.

Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education. 30(14), 1945-1969.

Aldahmash, A. H., Mansour, N. S., Alshamrani, S. M., & Almohi, S. (2016). An analysis of activities in Saudi Arabian middle school science textbooks and workbooks for the inclusion of essential features of inquiry. Research in Science Education, 46(6), 879-900.

Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26.

Chai, C., & Cheng, G. (2011). Policies on China’s basic education over the last thirty years. In X. Zhang (Ed.), China's Education development and policy, 1978-2008 (pp. 111-163). Leiden: Brill.

Chen, Z. S. (2018). Application of software and platform in primary and secondary chemistry teaching-promote the acid-base conceptual learning by creating an educational platform. Chemistry Education in Taiwan, 2018 (24), 1-7.

Chen, X., Goes, L. F., Treagust, D. F., & Eilks, I. (2019). An analysis of the visual representation of redox reactions in secondary chemistry textbooks from different Chinese communities. Education Sciences, 9(1), 42.

Chiappetta, E. L., & Fillman, D. A. (2007). Analysis of five high school biology textbooks used in the United States for inclusion of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(15), 1847-1868.

Clement, P. (Ed.). (2008). Special issue of SEI-relating to critical analysis of school science textbooks. Science Education International, 19(2), 98-250.

Davey, G., Lian, C. D., & Higgins, L. (2007). The university entrance examination system in China. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(4), 385-396.

Devetak, I., & Vogrinc, J. (2013). The criteria for evaluating the quality of the science textbooks. In M. Khine (Ed.), Critical Analysis of Science Textbooks (pp. 3-15). Dordrecht: Springer.

Dong Zong, 2018. The background of Dong Zong’s establishment. Available at: www.dongzong.my/eindex.php (accessed on 09 February2019).

Hofstein, A. (2017). The role of laboratory in science teaching and learning. In K.S. Taber & B. Akpan (Eds.), Science education (pp. 357-368). Rotterdam: Sense.

Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 201-217.

Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twentyâ€first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54.

Jones, M. E., Gott, R., & Jarman, R. (2000). Investigations as part of the key stage 4 science curriculum in Northern Ireland. Evaluation & Research in Education, 14(1), 23-37.

Katchevich, D., Hofstein, A., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2013). Argumentation in the chemistry laboratory: Inquiry and confirmatory experiments. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 317-345.

Khaddoor, R., Al-Amoush, S., & Eilks, I. (2017). A comparative analysis of the intended curriculum and its presentation in 10th grade chemistry textbooks from seven Arabic countries. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(2), 375-385.

Kim, H. T., & Kim J. G. (2013). How do high school textbooks in Korea, Japan and the U.S. explain bioaccumulation concepts? Science Education International, 24(4), 416-436,

Kim, H., & Song, J. (2006). The features of peer argumentation in middle school students' scientific inquiry. Research in Science Education, 36(3), 211-233.

Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2012). Nature of scientific knowledge and scientific inquiry: Building instructional capacity through professional development. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 335-359). Dordrecht: Springer.

Lin, T.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2016). Innovative technology-assisted science learning in Taiwan. In M.-H. Chiu (Ed.), Science education research and practice in Asia (pp. 189-209). Singapore: Springer.

Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis. www.psychopen.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/books/mayring/ssoar-2014-mayring-Qualitative_content_analysis_theoretical_foundation.pdf (accessed on 22 May 2019).

Millar, R. (2004). The role of practical work in the teaching and learning of science. Paper prepared for the meeting High School Science Laboratories: Role and Vision. Washington: National Academy of Sciences.

Millar, R., Le Maréchal, J.-F., & Tiberghien, A. (1998). A map of the variety of labwork. Labwork in science education. Available at: www.epitropakisg.gr/grigorise/Labwork-wp1.pdf (accessed on 13 May 2019).

Millar, R., Le Maréchal, J.-F., & Tiberghien, A. (1999). “Mapping†the domain: Varieties of practical work. In J. Leach & A. C. Paulsen (Eds.), Practical work in science education: Recent research studies (pp. 33-59). Roskilde: University of Roskilde.

Ministry of Education (2003). National upper secondary school chemistry curriculum standards. Beijing: People’s Education Press.

Ministry of Education (2017). National upper secondary school chemistry curriculum standards. Beijing: People’s Education Press.

Ministry of Education (2018). Notice of the teaching books for primary and secondary schools in 2018. Available at: http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A26/moe_714/201805/t20180507_335240.html (accessed on 20 May 2019)

National Academy for Educational Research (2018). Textbooks for upper secondary school. Available at: review.naer.edu.tw/Bulletin/PA02.php (accessed on 08 February 2019).

Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576.

Peen, T. Y., & Arshad, M. Y. (2014). Teacher and student questions: a case study in Malaysian secondary school problem-based learning. Asian Social Science. 10(4). 174-182.

Rusek, M., & Vojíř, K. (2019). Analysis of text difficulty in lower-secondary chemistry textbooks. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(1), 85-94.

Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (2018). Announcement of recommendation for primary and secondary textbooks for 2019 academic year. Available at: www.shmec.gov.cn/html/xxgk/201811/402052018009.html (accessed on 05 March 2019)

Stern, L., & Roseman, J. E. (2004). Can middleâ€school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum evaluation study: Life science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 41(6), 538-568.

Sun, Y., Xu, D., Zhang, F., & Zhao, C. (2016). 25 years of curriculum reform in Shanghai (上海课程改é©25å¹´): Shanghai Educational Publishing House.

Tamir, P., & Pilarâ€Garcia, M. (1992). Characteristics of laboratory exercises included in science textbooks in Catalonia (Spain). International Journal of Science Education, 14(4), 381-392.

Tiberghien, A., Veillard, L., Le Maréchal, J. F., Buty, C., & Millar, R. (2001). An analysis of labwork tasks used in science teaching at upper secondary school and university levels in several European countries. Science education, 85(5), 483-508.

Upahi, J. E., & Ramnarain, U. (2019). Representations of chemical phenomena in secondary school chemistry textbooks. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(1), 146-159.

Vivien, W. (2018). The language medium policies: A study on the development of independent Chinese secondary schools (ICSS) in Malaysia. KATHA, 13(1), 32-53.

Wang, L. (2010). Basic chemistry education curriculum reform progress and reflection in the past years (Volume I). Chinese Journal of Chemical Education, 31(4), 15-21.

Wang, L., Tang, J., Zhang, R., Hu, J., Zhi, Y., & Wei, R. (2015). Investigation of the use of new chemistry textbooks of senior high school and the influential factors. Journal of Educational Studies, 11(4), 77-86.

Watson, R. J., Swain, J. R. L., & McRobbie, C. (2004). Students' discussions in practical scientific inquiries. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 25-45.

Wei, B., & Chen, B. (2017). Examining the senior secondary school chemistry curriculum in China in view of scientific literacy. In L. Liang X.

Liu X & G. Fulmer (Eds.), Chinese science education in the 21st century: Policy, practice, and research. Contemporary trends and issues in science education (pp. 133-148). Dordrecht: Springer.

Xia, N., Yang, Y. N., & Lee, Y. E. (2018). Chinese Education in Malaysia under Malaysian Ethnic Politics. Journal of Politics and Law, 11(2). 23-36.

Xu, L. L., & Xu, P. (2016). The popularization of Chinese language in multilingual environment - Based on the analysis of examples from Malaysia. Paper presented at The 2nd International Conference on Modern Education and Social Science (MESS 2016).

Zhang, H., & Gao, Z. (2013). Curriculum studies in China: retrospect and prospect. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum research (2nd ed., pp. 118-133). New York: Routledge.

Published
2019-11-28