Modelling students’ perceived self-efficacy and importance towards core ideas and work and life skills in science education
Abstract
Abstract: Developing student self-efficacy and conceptualising the importance of core ideas are seen as important learning areas in science education. Such core ideas can be elucidated with respect to the science discipline as well as interdisciplinary learning. Schools can be expected to promote high levels of students’ self-efficacy in acquiring major disciplinary ideas and guiding students towards recognising the importance of gaining work and life skills. This research sought to develop models describing students’ gains in perceived self-efficacy and the importance of work and life skills as well as indicating the relationship with both disciplinary and interdisciplinary core ideas in science education. Using a validated instrument, data was collected from grade 8 (N=218) (14-15 years old) and grade 11 (N=95) (17-18 years old) students. Models were created based on confirmatory factor analysis and parallel analysis. This research shows that there is need to make changes in secondary school studies so as to more clearly recognise a framework for both disciplinary and interdisciplinary core ideas, shown to be important for enabling students to prepare for their future life and careers. Key words: disciplinary core ideas, interdisciplinary core ideas, modelling, perceived importance, perceived self-efficacy, work and life skillsReferences
References
Alazzi, K. & Chiodo, J. J. (2008), “Perceptions of social studies students about citizenship: a study of Jordanian middle and high school studentsâ€, The Educational Forum, 72(3), 271-280.
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: what research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12.
Atlas of Science Literacy (Project 2061). Mapping K-12 science learning.
http://www.project2061.org/publications/atlas/
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Ciampa, M. (2013). Student Perceived Importance and Correlations of Selected Computer Literacy Course Topics, Journal of Instructional Pedagogies v11.
Clark, E. (1997). Designing and implementing an integrated curriculum: A student-centered approach. Brandon, Vermont: Holistic Education Press.
Estonian Government (2011). Gümnaasiumi riiklik õppekava [National curriculum for gymnasium].
Regulation of the Government of the Republic of Estonia, No. 2. Tallinn.
European Commission (EC). 2010. New skills for new jobs: Action now, report by the Expert Group, Feb. (Brussels)
Greeno, J. G., & Engeström, Y. (2014). Learning in activity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 128–147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harlen, W., Devés, R., Garza, G., F., Léna, P., Millar, R., Reiss, M., Rowell, P., & Yu, W. (2015). Working with Big Ideas of Science Education, Published by the Science Education Programme (SEP) of IAP.
Harlen, W., Devés, R., Garza, G., F., Léna, P., Millar, R., Reiss, M., Rowell, P., & Yu, W. (2010). Principles and big ideas of science education, Published by the Association for Science Education.
Hildebrand, D., L. (2018). Experience is Not The Whole Story: The Integral Role of the Situation in Dewey’s Democracy and Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 52 (2), 287-300.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2010). Contextualisation, de-contextualisation, re-contextualisation. A science teaching approach to enhance meaningful learning for scientific literacy. In: I. Eilks & B. Ralle (Eds.), Contemporary science education (pp. 69-82). Shaker Verlag.
Holbrook, J. & Rannikmae, M. (2007). Nature of Science Education for Enhancing Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29 (11), 1347-1362.
Holbrook, J. & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The Meaning of Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4, (3), 275-288.
Kwon, N. (2008). A mixed-methods investigation of the relationship between critical thinking and library anxiety among undergraduate students in their information search process. College and Research Libraries, 69, 117-131.
Krajcik, J., & Delen, I. (2017). Engaging learners in STEM education. Estonian Journal of Education,5, (1). https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2017.5.1.02b
Lewis, T., F. (2017). Evidence Regarding the Internal Structure: Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50 (4), 239-247.
Mainzer K. (2009). Challenges of complexity in the 21st century. An interdisciplinary introduction. Eur. Rev. 17 219–236.
National Research Council (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165.
National Research Council. (2007). Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11625
OECD (2016), "Students’ attitudes towards science and expectations of science related careers ". In: PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2015). “Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications,†International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079.
Salonen, A., Hartikainen-Ahia, A., Hense, J., Scheersoi, & A., Keinonen, T. (2017). Secondary school students’ perceptions of working life skills in science-related careers. International Journal of Science Education, v39.
Sharp, L., A. (2018). Collaborative Digital Literacy Practices among Adult Learners: Levels of Confidence and Perceptions of Importance. International Journal of Instruction, v11 n1 p153-166.
Soobard, R., Semilarski, H., Holbrook, J., Rannikmäe, M. (2018). Grade 12 Students’ Perceived Self-Efficacy Towards Working Life Skills and Curriculum Content Promoted Through Science Education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17 (5), 838-850.
Stevens, S., Sutherland, L., & Krajcik, J.S. (2009). The big ideas of nanoscale science and engineering. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
Teppo, M., Semilarski, H., Soobard, R., Rannikmäe, M. (2017). Grade nine students’ learning motivation and interest towards science topics presented in different contexts. Estonian Journal of Education, 5(1), 130-170.
Thelk, A. D., Sundre, D. L., Horst, S. J., & Finney, S. J. (2009). Motivation matters: using the Student Opinion Scale to make valid inferences about student performance. The Journal of General Education, 58, 129–151.
Van Aalsvoort, J. (2004). Logical positivism as a tool to analyse the problem of chemistry’s lack of relevance in secondary school chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 26(9), 1151-1168.
Westheimer, J. (2015). What kind of citizen? Educating Our Children for the Common Good, Teachers College Press, New York, NY.
