Teachers’ Sense of efficacy: A Challenge for professional development towards teaching science as inquiry

  • Kumudu Priyanka Seneviratne Senior Lecturer Department of Science & Technology Education Faculty of Education University of Colombo, Colombo, 00300, Sri Lanka http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5219-3367
  • Junainah Abd Hamid Management and Science University, Shah Alam, Selangor, 40 100, Malaysia
  • Ali Khatibi Management and Science University, Shah Alam, Selangor, 40 100, Malaysia
  • Ferdous Azam Management and Science University, Shah Alam, Selangor, 40 100, Malaysia
  • Sepali Sudasinghe Management and Science University Colombo Learning Centre, Colombo 3, 00300, Sri Lanka

Abstract

A teacher’s receptivity to inquiry-based instruction is varied due to teacher self-efficacy which invariably affected by his or her immediate professional environment. This study examined how professional development (PD) designs affect in-service teachers’ efficacy beliefs to teach inquiry science. This investigation had three objectives: (a) describe teachers’ perceived self-efficacy towards inquiry-based science, (b) investigate the nature of professional development designs for inquiry-based science, and (c) examine the association among school characteristics, perceived support from PD programs, and teachers’ perceived self-efficacy in student engagement in scientific inquiry. Quantitative data using questionnaires were collected from 350 science teachers in state schools of Colombo and Homagama zones in Sri Lanka in 2018. A General Linear Model (GLM) Univariate analysis using SPSS 21.00 programme was used for data analysis. Findings revealed in-service teachers’ perceived self- efficacy in student engagement was lower than that of classroom management and instructional strategies associated with inquiry-based teaching. A notable fact was less use of PD programs with mastery experiences, which allows science teachers authentic experiences of scientific inquiry practices, while PD programs with vicarious sources of efficacy were comparatively higher. It also reported self-reported efficacy in engaging students in scientific inquiry significantly differed according to school type, support from PD programs, teachers’ self-efficacy in instructional strategies and classroom management. The results found no statistically significant differences in perceived efficacy in student engagement by education division in which school was situated. The implications and suggestions for future research are also discussed. Key words: Teacher self- efficacy, student engagement, classroom management, instructional strategies, inquiry-based science, professional development

Author Biography

Kumudu Priyanka Seneviratne, Senior Lecturer Department of Science & Technology Education Faculty of Education University of Colombo, Colombo, 00300, Sri Lanka
Senior LecturerDepartment of Science & Technology EducationFaculty of Education

References

References

Ahokoski, E., Korventausta, M., Veermans, K., & Jaakkla, T.(2017). Teachers’ experiences of an inquiry learning training course in Finland. Journal of Science Education, 28 (4), 305-314.

Almuntasheri, S., Gillies, R.M., Wright, T.(2016). The effectiveness of a guided inquiry-based, teachers’ professional development program on Saudi students’ understanding of Density. Science Education Journal, 27(1), 16-39.

American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12.

Appeton, K., & Kindt, I. (2002). Beginning elementary teachers’ development as teachers of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 43-61.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy the exercise of control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action- A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bryan, L.A., & Atwater, M.M. (2002).Teacher beliefs and cultural models: A challenge for science teacher preparation programs. Science Education, 86,821-839.

Capps, D.K., &Crawford, B.A. (2013a). Inquiry-based professional development: What does it take to support teachers in learning about the inquiry and nature of science? International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 1947-1978.

Choi, S., & Ramsey, J. (2009). Constructing elementary teachers’ beliefs, attitudes, and practical knowledge through an inquiry-based elementary science course. School Science and Mathematics, 109(6), 313-324.

Decoito, I., & Myszkal, P. (2018).Connecting science instruction and teachers’ self-efficacy and beliefs in STEM education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(3), 485-503.

Erticanto, C., Yunarti, T., & Saputra, A. (2017). Development and evaluation of a model-supported scientific inquiry training program for elementary teachers in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 10(3), 93-108.

Furtak, E.M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D.C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300-329.

Gunawardana, R. (2011).A study on the effectiveness of short-term in-service teacher training in the teaching-learning process. National Education Commission, Sri Lanka.

Gunning, A. M., & Menash, F. M. (2011). Pre-service primary teachers’ development of self-efficacy and confidence to teach science: A case study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22,171-185. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9198-8

Holtzberger, D., Philipp, A., & Kunter, M. (2013). How teachers’ self-efficacy is related to instructional quality: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 774-786.

Jeanpierre, B., Oberhauser, K., Freeman, C.(2005).Characteristics of professional development that effect change in secondary science teachers’ classroom practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 668-690.

Kennedy, M. (1998).Form and substance in in-service teacher education (Research Monograph No.3) Madison, WI: National Institute for Science Education.

Kenny, J.D., Hobbs, L., Herbert, S., Jones, M. Chittleborough, G., Campbell, A., & Redman, C. (2014). Science Teacher Education Partnerships (STEPS) in science teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(12).http:// dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n12.4

Klassen, R.M., & Tze, V.M. (2014).Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59-76.

Lazonder, A.W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). A meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681-718.

Lee, C. K., & Shea, M. (2016). An analysis of pre-service elementary teachers’ understandings of inquiry-based science teaching, International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 219-237.

Leonard, J., Barner-Jihnson, J., Dantly, S.J., & Kimber, C. (2011). Teaching science inquiry in urban contexts: the role of elementary pre-service teachers’ beliefs. The Urban Review, 43, 124-150. doi: 10.1007/s11256-010-0173-7

Lewthwaite, B. (2006). I want to enable teachers in their change: Exploring the role of a superintendent on science curriculum delivery. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 52, 1-24.

Liang, L.L., & Richardson G.M. (Winter 2009). Enhancing prospective teachers’ science teaching efficacy beliefs through scaffolded, student-directed inquiry, Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(1), 51-66.

Lotter, C. R., Thompson, S., Dickenson, T. S., Smiley, W. F., Blue, G., Rea. M. (2018).The Impact of Practice-Teaching Professional Development Model on Teachers' Inquiry Instruction and Inquiry Efficacy Beliefs, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(2), 255-273.

Lotter, C., Harwood, W.S. & Bonner, J.J. (2007).The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers’ use of inquiry teaching practices. Journal of Research in Teaching Science, 44 (9), 1318-1347.

MaCaul, T. (2007). Study of the Implementation of Mathematics and Science Curriculum in Grade 6 and 10: Final report, Colombo: World Bank. Retrieved from the Articles base website: http://www.sooperarticles.com/education-articles/tutoring- articles/effectiveteachers-teaching-what-principals-need-know-impact-student-achievement- 398093.html

Magee, P. & R. Flessner, R. (2012).. Collaborating to improve inquiry-based teaching in elementary science and mathematics methods course. Science Education International, 23(4), 353-365.

Mansfield, C.F., & Woods-McConney, A. (2012). “I didn’t always perceive myself as a “science personâ€: Examining efficacy for primary science teaching. Journal of Primary Science Education, 37(10), 37-52.

Mintzes, J., B. Marcum, B., Messerschmidt-Yates, C., & Mark, A(2013). Enhancing self-efficacy in elementary science teaching with professional learning communities. Journal Science Teacher Education, 24(7), 1202-1218.

Morrison, J.A. (2014). Scientists’ participation in teacher professional development: The impact on fourth to eighth-grade teachers’ understanding and implementation of inquiry science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 793-816.

National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council [NRC]. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Palmer, D., Dixon, J. Archer J. (2015).Changes in science teaching self –efficacy among primary teacher education students. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(12), 27-40.

Ramnarain, U. (2016). Understanding the influence of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on inquiry-based science education at township schools in South Africa. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(4), 598-619.

Rice, D.C., & Roychoudhury, A. (2003). Preparing more confident pre-service elementary science teachers: One elementary science methods teacher’s self-study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(2), 97-126.

Roberts, T.G., Harlin, J.F., Briers, G.E. (2006). A longitudinal examination of the teaching efficacy of agricultural science students teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 47(2), 81-92.doi:10.5032/jae.2006.03056

Sandholtz, J.H., & Ringstaff, C. (2013). Assessing the impact of teacher development on science instruction in the early elementary grades in rural US schools. Professional Development in Education, 39(5), 678-697.

Seneviratne, D. V. K. P., Khatibi, A., & Azam, S. M. F. (2018, June). Changes in practicing teachers’ self-efficacy in teaching scientific inquiry. Paper presented at the fifteenth Annual World Congress of Academy for Global Business Advancement (AGBA) on Business and Entrepreneurship Development in a Globalized and Digitalized Era, Bangkok, Thailand.

Seneviratne, D.V.K.P. (2018, November). Teaching Science as Inquiry: The role of novice vs. experienced Teachers’ Self-efficacy, a paper presented at the Annual Research Symposium, Faculty of Education, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Seneviratne, K., Hamid, J, A., Khatib, A., & Azam, F., & Sudasinghe, S. (2019b). Multi-faceted Professional Development Designs for Science teachers’ self-efficacy for inquiry-based teaching: A Critical review. Manuscript submitted for publication

Seneviratne, K., Hamid, J, A., Khatibi, A., & Azam, F., & Sudasinghe, S. (2019b). In-service science teachers’ self-efficacy in teaching scientific inquiry: A case in Sri Lanka. Manuscript submitted for publication

Silm, G., Tiitsaar, K., Pedaste, M., Zacharia, Z.C., Papaevripidou, M. (2017). Teachers’ readiness to use inquiry-learning: An investigation of teachers ‘sense of efficacy and attitudes toward inquiry-based learning, Science Education Journal, 28(4), 315- 325.

Smolleck, L.A. & Mongan, A.M. (2011). Changes in pre-service teachers; self-efficacy: From science methods to student teaching. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 1, 133-145.doi:10.5539/jedp.v1n1p133.

Stripling, C., Rcketts, J.C., Roberts, T.G. & Harlin, J.F. (2008).Pre-service agriculture education teachers’ sense of teaching self-efficacy. Journal of Agricultural Education, 49(4), 120-130

Swan, B.G., Wolf, K.J., & Cano, J. (2011).Changes in teacher self-efficacy from the student teaching experience through the third year of teaching. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(2), 128-139. doi;10.5032/jae.2011.02128

Swars, S.L. & Dooley, C.M. (2010).Changes in teaching efficacy during a professional development school-based science methods course. School Science and Mathematics, 110,193-202. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2010.00022.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783- 805.

Voet, M., & De Wever, B. (2017).Preparing pre-service history teachers for organizing inquiry-based learning: The effects of an introductory training program. Teacher and Teacher Education, 63,206-217.

Wolf, K.J., Foster, D.D. & Berkenholz, R.J. (2008).Changes in teacher self-efficacy and perceptions of preparation of agricultural education teacher candidates. Proceedings of the North Central AAAE Conference, Cornell, NY, 180-191. Retrieved from http:aaaeonline.org/allconferences.php?show_what=NorthCentral

Zimmerman, W.A., Knight, S. L., Favre, D.E., & Ikhlef, A. (2017). Effect of professional development on teaching behaviors and efficacy in Qatari educational reforms.

Published
2019-11-26