Enhancing Bhutanese students' views of the nature of science in matter and its composition and study of gas laws through an explicit and reflective approach
Abstract
This study investigated the development of Bhutanese students’ views of the nature of science (NOS) as they engaged in an explicit and reflective approach. Seven aspects of NOS were integrated into the chemistry content in two learning units titled “matter and its composition” and “study of gas laws” over a time span of 6 weeks in a 9th Grade class. This study employed mixed method approaches which included the use of a questionnaire, semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and a review of students’ journals, and assignments. Data were analyzed for established patterns and themes. Students’ views of the NOS in pre-instruction and post-instruction were categorized as naïve, transitional, or informed. The results indicated that at the end of the intervention, students’ views of the NOS had improved. It was seen that NOS-specific pedagogical knowledge and subject knowledge played an important role in the teacher’s ability to enhance students’ views of the NOS.References
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G.(2000). Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665 - 701.
Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295-317.
Author. (2013). Research in Science Education.
Author. (2017). Research in Science Education.
Bell, R. L. (2008). Teaching the nature of science through science process skills: Activities for grade 3-8. New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon /Longman.
Bell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students' understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 487-509.
Bell, R. L., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2000). Developing and acting upon one's conception of the nature of science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 563-581.
Bell, R. L., Matkins, J. J., & Gansneder, B. M. (2011). Impacts of contextual and explicit instruction on preservice elementary teachers' understandings of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 48, 414-436.
Brickhouse, N. W., Dagher, Z. R., Letts Iv, W. J., & Shipman, H. L. (2000). Diversity of students' views about evidence, theory, and the interface between science and religion in an Astronomy Course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 340-362.
Bucat, R. (2004). Pedagogical content knowledge as a way forward: Applied research in chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5, 215-228.
Clough, M. P. (2006). Learners’ responses to the demands of conceptual change: Considerations for effective nature of science instruction. Science & Education, 15, 463-494.
Clough, M. P., & Olson, J. K. (2012). Impact of a nature of science and science education course on teachers' nature of science classroom practices. In S.M. Khine (Ed.), Advances in nature of science research: concepts and methodologies (pp. 247-266). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Department of Curriculum Research and Department. (2012). Science curriculum framework classes pp-xii. Thimphu, Bhutan: Royal Government of Bhutan.
Duschl, R.A. (1990). Reconstructing science education: The importance of theories and their development. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Hanuscin, D. L., Akerson, V. L., & Phillipson-Mower, T. (2006). Integrating nature of science instruction into a physical science content course for preservice elementary teachers: NOS views of teaching assistants. Science Education, 90, 912-935.
Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 551-578.
Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N.G.(2006). Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: Integrated versus nonintegrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 395-418.
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497-521.
Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S.K. Abell, & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831 - 879). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
Lederman, N.G., Wade, P.D., & Bell, R.L. (1998). Assessing understanding of the nature of science: A historical perspectives. In W.F. McComas (Ed.), The Nature of Science in Science Education (pp. 331 - 350). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Liang, L. L., Chen S., Chen, X., Kaya, O. N., Adams, A. D., Macklin, M., & Ebenezer, J. (2008). Assessing preservice elementary teachers' views on the nature of scientific knowledge: a dual-response instrument. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9, 1–20.
McComas, W. F. (2004). Keys to teaching the nature of science. The Science Teacher, 71(9), 24 – 27.
McComas, W. F., & Olson, J. K. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standard documents. In W.F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education (pp. 41 - 52). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2012). New Zealand Curriculum Guides Senior Secondary.(Online ). http://seniorsecondary.tki.org.nz/Science/Nature-of-science (Access November, 2012).
Park, H., Nielsen, W., &Woodruff, E. (2014). Students’ conceptions of the nature of science: perspectives from Canadian and Korean middle school students. Science & Education, 23, 1169-1196.
Rubba, P. A., & Andersen, H. O. (1978). Development of an instrument to assess secondary school students understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 62, 449-458.
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 610-645.
Yacoubian, H. A., & BouJaoude, S. (2010). The effect of reflective discussions following inquiry-based laboratory activities on students' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 1229-1252.
