Biology Students' Cognitive Structures about Basic Components of Living Organisms

  • Murat Ozarslan Department of Biology, Ministry of National Education, Kocaeli, Turkey
  • Gülcan Çetin Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Biology Education, Necatibey Faculty of Education, Balıkesir University, Balıkesir, Turkey

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate 9th grade biology students’ cognitive structures about the basic components of the living organisms and association between the concepts forming these basic components. Participants consisted of 50 9th grade biology students in two secondary schools in the northwest of Turkey. Data were collected by the word association test (WAT) and the questionnaire of writing sentence (QWS). The WAT is comprised 16 key concepts related to Biology: Inorganic compounds, organic compounds, acid, base, salt, water, mineral, carbohydrate, fat, protein, enzyme, vitamin, nucleic acid, DNA, RNA, and ATP. For the analysis of the WAT, the frequencies of the number of words and the number of word varieties about each key concept in the WAT were counted. Mind maps were then drawn with the help of the technique of breakpoint according to represent the WAT data. The QWS was analyzed by content analysis method. The study results showed that the existing conceptual relationships in the mind maps of the students were actively used in the sentences in the students’ written QWS. The experiences of the students such as life, laboratory studies, and the sharing of teachers in lessons on healthy diet were effective in the cognitive structures of the students. However, the existence of significant deficiencies and some non-scientific relationships in the students’ cognitive structures on basic components of living organisms were detected.

Author Biographies

Murat Ozarslan, Department of Biology, Ministry of National Education, Kocaeli, Turkey
...............
Gülcan Çetin, Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Biology Education, Necatibey Faculty of Education, Balıkesir University, Balıkesir, Turkey
..

References

Adıgüzel, A. (2009). Yenilenen ilköğretim programının uygulanması sürecinde karşılaşılan sorunlar (The problems encountered during the application of the new primary education program). Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(17), 77- 94.

Atasoy, B. (2004). Fen eğitimi ve öğretimi (Science education and teaching). Ankara: Gündüz Education and Publishing.

Ay, M. (2010). Conceptual frameworks of university students regarding accounting. African Journal of Business Management, 5(5), 1570-1577.

Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, New Series, 255 (5044), 556-559.

Bağcı Kılıç, G. (2001). Oluşturmacı fen öğretimi (Constructivist science teaching) Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi (Journal of Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice), 1(1), 7-22.

Bahar, M. & Özatlı, S. (2003). Kelime iletişim test yöntemi ile lise 1. sınıf öğrencilerinin canlıların temel bileşenleri konusundaki bilişsel yapılarının araştırılması (Study on the cognitive structures of the 1st grade high school students related to the basic components of organisms via the word association test method). Balıkesir University Institute of Physical Sciences Journal, 5, 75-85.

Bahar, M. & Tongaç, E. (2009). The effect of teaching approaches on the pattern of pupils’ cognitive structure: Some evidence from the field. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(1), 21-45.

Bahar, M., Johnstone, A.H. & Sutcliffe, R.G. (1999). Investigation of students’ cognitive structure in elementary genetics through word association tests. Journal of Biological Education, 33, 134-141.

Bahar, M. Nartgün, Z. Durmuş, S. & Bıçak, B. (2006). Geleneksel ve alternatif ölçme ve değerlendirme öğretmen el kitabı (Traditional measurement and evaluation teacher’s handbook). Ankara: Pegem-A Publishing.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2013). Scientific research methods (8th ed). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Çakıcı, Y., (2008). Fen ve teknoloji öğretiminde yapılandırıcı yaklaşım (Constructivist approach in science education). In Ö. Taşkın (ed). Fen ve teknoloji öğretiminde yeni yaklaşımlar [New approaches in science education]. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.

Çardak, O. (2009). Students’ ideas about dangerous animals. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 8.

DemirbaÅŸ, M. & ErtuÄŸrul, N. (2014). A study on preschoolers' conceptual perceptions of states of matter: A case study of Turkish students. South African Journal of Education, 34(3), 01-13.

Durmuş, S. (2001). Matematik öğretiminde oluşturmacı yaklaşımlar (Constructionist approaches to mathematics teaching). Journal of Educational Sciences in Theory and Practice), 1(1), 91-107.

Ercan, F., Taşdere, A. & Ercan, N. (2010). Kelime ilişkilendirme testi aracılığıyla bilişsel yapının ve kavramsal değişimin gözlenmesi (Observation of cognitive structure and conceptual changes through word associations tests). Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(2), 155-157.

Gulacar, O., Sinan, O., Bowman, C.R., & Yıldırım, Y. (2014). Exploring the changes in students’ understanding of the scientific method using word associations. Research in Science Education, 45(5):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s11165-014-9443-9

Gussarsky, E., & Gorodetsky, M. (1988). On the chemical equilibrium concept: Constrained word associations and conception. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(5), 319-333.

Ivie, S.D. (1998). Ausubel’s learning theory: An approach to teaching higher order thinking skills (Educational psychologist David Paul Ausubel). High School Journal, 35(1), 35-42.

Kempa, R.F., & Nicholls, C.E. (1983). Problem solving ability and cognitive structure an explanatory investigation. European Journal of Science Education, 5, 171-184.

Kempa, R.F. (1991). Students’ learning difficulties in science. Causes and possible remedies. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 9(2), 119-128.

Kırbaş, A. & Orhan, S. (2011). Görsel materyallerle desteklenmiş yazma çalışmalarının öğrencilerin yazma becerilerini geliştirmeye etkisi (The effect of writing exercises supported by visual materials on the development of writing skills). Turkish Studies-International Periodical for The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 6(4), 705-714.

Kurt, H. (2013). Biology student teachers’ cognitive structure about “living thing". Educational Research and Reviews, 8(12), 871-880.

Kurt, H., Ekici, G., Aksu, Ö. & Aktaş, M. (2013). The most important concept of transport and circulatory systems: Turkish biology student teachers’ cognitive structure. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(17), 1574-1593.

Kurt, H., Ekici, G., AktaÅŸ, M., & Aksu, Ö. (2013). On the concept of “respirationâ€: Biology student teachers’ cognitive structures and alternative conceptions. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(21), 2101-2121.

Lee, K-W. L., Tang, W.-U., Goh. N.-K. & Chia L-S. (2001). The predicting role of cognitive variables in problem solving in mole concept. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 2(3), 285–301.

Nakiboğlu, C. (2008). Using word associations for assessing non major science students’ knowledge structure before and after general chemistry instruction: the case of atomic structure. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9, 309-322.

Onan, B. (2012). Türkçenin ana dili olarak öğretiminde bilgi işleme süreci (Data Processing Process in the Teaching of Turkish as a Mother Tongue). Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 8(1), 96-113.

Özata Yücel, E. & Özkan, M. (2015). Determination of secondary school students’ cognitive structure, and misconception in ecological concepts through word association test. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(5), 660-674.

Özatlı, N. S. (2006). Öğrencilerin biyoloji derslerinde zor olarak algıladıkları konuların tespiti ve boşaltım sistemi konusundaki bilişsel yapılarının yeni teknikler ile ortaya konması (Determination of the subjects students have difficulty in understanding in biology lessons and establishment of the cognitive structures about urinary system via new techniques). Unpublished PhD Thesis, Balıkesir University, Balıkesir.

Perker, Z.S. (2011). Mimarlık öğrencilerinin malzeme bilgisinin arttırılmasında fabrika gezilerinin rolü: Metodolojik bir analiz (The role of factory visits in the material knowledge enhancement of architecture students: A methodological analysis). SAÜ. Journal of Physical Sciences, 15(1), 82-88.

Ring, D.G. & Novak, J.D. (1971). The effects of cognitive structure variable on achievement in college chemistry Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 8(4), 325-333.

Şahin, M.B., Ağrılı, H., Koşun, E. & Mengi, H. (2008). Minerals. Ankara: General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration Periodicals.

Schunk, D.H. (2009). Öğrenme teorileri-eğitimsel bir bakış (Theories of learning-an educational perspective). (Translated by: Ed. Muzaffer Şahin). Ankara: Nobel Publishing Distribution.

Sezen, G. & Çimer, A. (2009). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının insanda dolaşım sistemi konusundaki kavramları anlama seviyelerinin kavram haritası ve kelime ilişkilendirme testi ile belirlenmesi (Determination of science teacher candidates’ comprehension level of the concepts related to the circulatory system in humans via concept map and word association test). Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Kongresi (1st International Educational Research Congress), Çanakkale On Sekiz Mart University, Çanakkale.

Shuell, T.J. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 411- 436.

Şimşek, N. (2004). Yapılandırmacı öğrenme ve öğretime eleştirel bir bakış (A critical perspective on constructivist learning and teaching). Educational Sciences and Application, 3(5), 115-139.

Sinan, O., Yıldırım, O., Kocakülah, M.S. & Aydın, H. (2006). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının proteinler, enzimler ve protein sentezi ile ilgili kavram yanılgıları (Misconceptions of science teacher candidates on proteins, enzymes and protein synthesis. Journal of Gazi Faculty of Education), 1(26), 1-16.

Solaz-Portolés, J.J. & Lopez, V.S. (2007). Representations in problem solving in science: Directions for practice. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 4. Available at http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/v8_issue2/joan/index.htm#con. Accessed 29 April 2016.

Solso, L., Maclin, M.K. & Maclin, O.H. (2009). Cognitive psychology. (Translated by: Ayşe Ayçiçeği Dinn). İstanbul: Kitapevi Publishing.

Stears, M. & Gopal, N. (2010). Exploring alternative assessment strategies in science classrooms. South African Journal of Education, 30(4), 591-604.

Tongaç, E. (2006). Farklı öğretim yaklaşımlarının öğrencilerin fen bilgisi dersi dolaşım sistemi konusundaki bilişsel yapılarına etkilerinin araştırılması (A study on the effects of different teaching approaches on the cognitive structures of students about the science lesson circulatory system). Unpublished Master’s Thesis. AİBU, Institute of Social Sciences, Bolu.

Tsai, C.-C. (1998). An analysis of Taiwanese eighth graders’ science achievement, scientific epistemological beliefs and cognitive structure outcomes after learning basic atomic theory. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 413-425. Tulving, E. (1993). What is episodic memory. Current directions in psychological science, 2(3), 67-70.

Uzun, N., Özsoy, S. & Keleş, Ö. (2010). Opinions of teacher candidates on the concept of biological diversity. Journal of Biological Sciences Research, 3(1), 93-99.

White, R. & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding, London: The Falmer Press.

Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (Qualitative research methods in social sciences). Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.

Zan, N., Zan, B.U. & Morgil, F. Ä°. (2015). The word cloud illustration of the cognitive structures of teacher candidates about education concept. Smart Education and Smart e-Learning, 41, 357-370, doi: 10.1007 /978-3-319-19875-0_32.

Zeki, C.P. & Güneyli, A. (2014). Student teachers' perceptions about their experiences in a student centered course. South African Journal of Education, 34(3), 01-07.

Published
2018-05-27